Society's Satan/Pierre Roemer/Funin Sun Banned - Saviors of Saviors of Earth 2009-08-06T20:57:37Z http://saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com/forum/topics/societys-satanpierre?feed=yes&xn_auth=no Running with your tail betw... tag:saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com,2009-08-02:2827019:Comment:23013 2009-08-02T06:14:18.662Z DeusEx Running with your tail between your legs as usual then, Tony? You are still harping on about a sentence that you are incapable of understanding. Perhaps you need to dust off some English books. Do not attempt to invalidate the work SOSOE has done or what I have done using one sentence. You see, we have debunked Brad many times and proved our point on numerous occasions. The same applies to you and your actions or in actuality, lack of action. If you want a good example of rhetoric, just look at&hellip; Running with your tail between your legs as usual then, Tony? You are still harping on about a sentence that you are incapable of understanding. Perhaps you need to dust off some English books. Do not attempt to invalidate the work SOSOE has done or what I have done using one sentence. You see, we have debunked Brad many times and proved our point on numerous occasions. The same applies to you and your actions or in actuality, lack of action. If you want a good example of rhetoric, just look at your man Brad's post where you agreed "A-Z". Until next time.<br /> <br /> P.S. - <b>If you want to come on here and act macho, make your own post instead of derailing others.</b> Thanks for finding the scre... tag:saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com,2009-08-02:2827019:Comment:23012 2009-08-02T06:12:28.780Z LeavingSOE Thanks for finding the screenshot and proving my point. You could have banned him right then and there by your own rules. You gave him more slack than any of your other SOSOE-related bans which begs the question of whether or not that was because he was insulting SOSOE to a higher degree than SOE. Or maybe you were just practicing "unconditional love" that day.<br /> <br /> Also, those "..."s in the quoted text are actually pretty damned important. But sorry, I'm thinking with my left-brain again.<br /> <br /> On a sid&hellip; Thanks for finding the screenshot and proving my point. You could have banned him right then and there by your own rules. You gave him more slack than any of your other SOSOE-related bans which begs the question of whether or not that was because he was insulting SOSOE to a higher degree than SOE. Or maybe you were just practicing "unconditional love" that day.<br /> <br /> Also, those "..."s in the quoted text are actually pretty damned important. But sorry, I'm thinking with my left-brain again.<br /> <br /> On a side note, LOL @ your parroting whatever insults are hurled at you. Love and light in all its glory. I'll take the Christians at least pretending to turn the other cheek than your fucked up belief system that lets you just make the rules up as you go.<br /> <br /> <cite>Tony said:</cite><blockquote cite="http://saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com/forum/topics/societys-satanpierre?x=1&amp;id=2827019%3ATopic%3A22734&amp;page=3#2827019Comment23008"><div>How can you not read it as such? it is there in front of you in black and white...here let me repeat it ""I'm amazed Tony and the other moderators are allowing his shit to continue but then again he's speaking out against SOSOE so it's good for Brad and their agenda."<br/> so for you to state, i dont read this as ","Tony left it up because Funin Sun/Pierre is speaking out against SOSOE." is rediculous. Here word for word;<br /> - statement deux (Tony ....allowing... his shit.......speaking out aginst sosoe...)<br /> - your words (Tony.....left it up... funinsun....speaking out aginst SOSOE...)<br /> <br /> its nearly word for word.<br /> <br /> As for your last statement, again the usual rhetoric, but again easily disproven...the only comment i made (where brad and funinsun are in a thread) was in the thread where Brad stated his action. Here is your own proof and thanks for keeping it ; <a href="http://saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com/forum/topics/brad-continues-his-threats">http://saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com/forum/topics/brad-continues...</a><br /> <br /> So again a backfired attempt at attacking me, maybe you should have a go at my bum instead? as for the ban, well he had already been banned (as Pierre). In fact quite funny looking back how sosoe thought he was a troll sent over from soe, he was banned at soe and probably had nowhere else to go. But i guess the temptation for attacking him as a troll was just to great a temptation, that is why this site is getting more rediculous by the day that even attacks on bums and suspected trolls is getting the upper hand.<br /> <br /> <cite>LeavingSOE said:</cite><blockquote cite="http://saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com/forum/topics/societys-satanpierre?x=1&amp;id=2827019%3ATopic%3A22734&amp;page=3#2827019Comment23004"><div>@Tony<br/><br/>The exact quote that brought you out from under the bridge:<br/><br/>"I'm amazed Tony and the other moderators are allowing his shit to continue but then again he's speaking out against SOSOE so it's good for Brad and their agenda."<br/><br/>I didn't read this as,"Tony left it up because Funin Sun/Pierre is speaking out against SOSOE." I think you're the one making assumptions here. I actually saw you and Brad both post along side Funin Sun in threads that was aimed at SOSOE - a thread where Funin Sun commented violently about SOSOE members (that includes both you and Brad, by the way). So either a) you don't read the other comments when you post in a thread or b) you didn't see a problem with Funin Sun's comments. Too bad we didn't get a screencap of that thread. Now that you've banned Funin Sun, the evidence is scrubbed away, and you can rewrite history however you see fit.<br/><br/>Don't get me wrong, I think Funin Sun/Pierre has no business being online unsupervised and a ban was in order. I just find it interesting that you waited on the ban until somewhere here pointed it out instead of after you (more likely than not) saw his comments in the thread you responded to.<br/><br/>C'est la vie.<br/><br/><cite>Tony said:</cite><blockquote cite="http://saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com/forum/topics/societys-satanpierre?x=1&amp;id=2827019%3ATopic%3A22734&amp;page=3#2827019Comment23003"><div>Not the content PS, but the statement made by Deusx that it was purely left there as it attacked sosoe and fitted our agenda. This statement ofcourse fitted his agenda to blacken soe whenever possible. Where i have stated and proven that we don't check every post made nor do we intend to do so.<br/><br/><cite>ParadigmShift said:</cite><blockquote cite="http://saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com/forum/topics/societys-satanpierre?x=1&amp;id=2827019%3ATopic%3A22734&amp;page=3#2827019Comment22997"><div>I just thought I'd point out to you that you're arguing over the content of a thread started by <b>Pierre</b>.</div> </blockquote> </div> </blockquote> </div> </blockquote> </div> </blockquote> Ok Tony see u next time bro... tag:saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com,2009-08-02:2827019:Comment:23011 2009-08-02T05:20:08.807Z Tab Ok Tony see u next time bro.<br /> <br /> And I'm glad you liked my little 'Druanna's arse is ginormous' troll. The fact of you mentioning it on several occasions has done nothing but make it more successful; I sincerely thank you for that.<br /> <br /> So again you come here to argue some minute details and punctuation in the case this time of a nutcase little quack which was barely a bleep on the radar for either of our tribes. Defending your actions, quoting, referring to prior posts, trying to prove you were just t&hellip; Ok Tony see u next time bro.<br /> <br /> And I'm glad you liked my little 'Druanna's arse is ginormous' troll. The fact of you mentioning it on several occasions has done nothing but make it more successful; I sincerely thank you for that.<br /> <br /> So again you come here to argue some minute details and punctuation in the case this time of a nutcase little quack which was barely a bleep on the radar for either of our tribes. Defending your actions, quoting, referring to prior posts, trying to prove you were just the best little admin there ever was...lol.<br /> <br /> I guess you must be under the impression that all these little righteous fury bannings will add up and counteract the fact that you, to this day, refuse to acknowledge the wrongdoing of our dearest Jewawan. You prefer to not even speak in disapproval, as a human being in your position would, of his obvious charlatanism. Just ambiguous ignorance and a very weighted "no comment".<br /> <br /> Well I'm afraid the bottom line is until you speak your true mind you are as responsible as he is for what has gone on and what there is to come.<br /> <br /> See you next time you come here to argue about some unimportant bullshit.<br /> <br /> Namaste Tony said:w And guys stick ... tag:saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com,2009-08-02:2827019:Comment:23010 2009-08-02T03:47:27.856Z ParadigmShift <cite>Tony said:</cite><blockquote cite="http://saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com/forum/topics/societys-satanpierre?id=2827019%3ATopic%3A22734&amp;page=3#2827019Comment23009"><div>w And guys stick to the topic...<br/> .</div> </blockquote> <br /> Did you forget you're not in SOE anymore? Blow it out your "arse". <cite>Tony said:</cite><blockquote cite="http://saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com/forum/topics/societys-satanpierre?id=2827019%3ATopic%3A22734&amp;page=3#2827019Comment23009"><div>w And guys stick to the topic...<br/> .</div> </blockquote> <br /> Did you forget you're not in SOE anymore? Blow it out your "arse". well before the usual 5-10 ... tag:saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com,2009-08-02:2827019:Comment:23009 2009-08-02T03:27:12.346Z Tony well before the usual 5-10 members come up with more of the usual rhetoric i take my leave. And guys stick to the topic, my "jump-in" was at the bullshit statement copied and pasted.<br /> <br /> as usual this thread will also get lost in the bums, trolls, thickness of arms, voice misalignment with video, mc donalds meals and other grasping for topics threads but if i see one worthy of response count on me to do so. well before the usual 5-10 members come up with more of the usual rhetoric i take my leave. And guys stick to the topic, my "jump-in" was at the bullshit statement copied and pasted.<br /> <br /> as usual this thread will also get lost in the bums, trolls, thickness of arms, voice misalignment with video, mc donalds meals and other grasping for topics threads but if i see one worthy of response count on me to do so. How can you not read it as ... tag:saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com,2009-08-02:2827019:Comment:23008 2009-08-02T03:19:38.016Z Tony How can you not read it as such? it is there in front of you in black and white...here let me repeat it ""I'm amazed Tony and the other moderators are allowing his shit to continue but then again he's speaking out against SOSOE so it's good for Brad and their agenda."<br /> <br /> so for you to state, i dont read this as ","Tony left it up because Funin Sun/Pierre is speaking out against SOSOE."<br /> is rediculous. Here word for word;<br /> - statement deux (Tony ....allowing... his shit.......speaking out aginst soso&hellip; How can you not read it as such? it is there in front of you in black and white...here let me repeat it ""I'm amazed Tony and the other moderators are allowing his shit to continue but then again he's speaking out against SOSOE so it's good for Brad and their agenda."<br /> <br /> so for you to state, i dont read this as ","Tony left it up because Funin Sun/Pierre is speaking out against SOSOE."<br /> is rediculous. Here word for word;<br /> - statement deux (Tony ....allowing... his shit.......speaking out aginst sosoe...)<br /> - your words (Tony.....left it up... funinsun....speaking out aginst SOSOE...)<br /> <br /> its nearly word for word.<br /> <br /> As for your last statement, again the usual rhetoric, but again easily disproven...the only comment i made (where brad and funinsun are in a thread) was in the thread where Brad stated his action. Here is your own proof and thanks for keeping it ; <a href="http://saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com/forum/topics/brad-continues-his-threats">http://saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com/forum/topics/brad-continues-his-threats</a><br /> <br /> So again a backfired attempt at attacking me, maybe you should have a go at my bum instead? as for the ban, well he had already been banned (as Pierre). In fact quite funny looking back how sosoe thought he was a troll sent over from soe, he was banned at soe and probably had nowhere else to go. But i guess the temptation for attacking him as a troll was just to great a temptation, that is why this site is getting more rediculous by the day that even attacks on bums and suspected trolls is getting the upper hand.<br /> <br /> <cite>LeavingSOE said:</cite><blockquote cite="http://saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com/forum/topics/societys-satanpierre?x=1&amp;id=2827019%3ATopic%3A22734&amp;page=3#2827019Comment23004"><div>@Tony<br/><br/>The exact quote that brought you out from under the bridge:<br/><br/>"I'm amazed Tony and the other moderators are allowing his shit to continue but then again he's speaking out against SOSOE so it's good for Brad and their agenda."<br/><br/>I didn't read this as,"Tony left it up because Funin Sun/Pierre is speaking out against SOSOE." I think you're the one making assumptions here. I actually saw you and Brad both post along side Funin Sun in threads that was aimed at SOSOE - a thread where Funin Sun commented violently about SOSOE members (that includes both you and Brad, by the way). So either a) you don't read the other comments when you post in a thread or b) you didn't see a problem with Funin Sun's comments. Too bad we didn't get a screencap of that thread. Now that you've banned Funin Sun, the evidence is scrubbed away, and you can rewrite history however you see fit.<br/><br/>Don't get me wrong, I think Funin Sun/Pierre has no business being online unsupervised and a ban was in order. I just find it interesting that you waited on the ban until somewhere here pointed it out instead of after you (more likely than not) saw his comments in the thread you responded to.<br/><br/>C'est la vie.<br/><br/><cite>Tony said:</cite><blockquote cite="http://saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com/forum/topics/societys-satanpierre?x=1&amp;id=2827019%3ATopic%3A22734&amp;page=3#2827019Comment23003"><div>Not the content PS, but the statement made by Deusx that it was purely left there as it attacked sosoe and fitted our agenda. This statement ofcourse fitted his agenda to blacken soe whenever possible. Where i have stated and proven that we don't check every post made nor do we intend to do so.<br/><br/><cite>ParadigmShift said:</cite><blockquote cite="http://saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com/forum/topics/societys-satanpierre?x=1&amp;id=2827019%3ATopic%3A22734&amp;page=3#2827019Comment22997"><div>I just thought I'd point out to you that you're arguing over the content of a thread started by <b>Pierre</b>.</div> </blockquote> </div> </blockquote> </div> </blockquote> haha Deux trying everything... tag:saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com,2009-08-02:2827019:Comment:23007 2009-08-02T02:48:40.900Z Tony haha Deux trying everything you can to avoid the cockup you made by drowning the thread in the usual sosoe bullshit rhetoric.<br /> <br /> - The Initial statement which i commented on was you pointing out that the thread was left there becasue if fitted the soe agenda, you were clearly proven wrong<br /> <br /> - as this account hasnt been deleted the record shows that i stated whenever an sosoe member started to swear and become insulting in a thread then so would i from that moment on. James first used the term, i ju&hellip; haha Deux trying everything you can to avoid the cockup you made by drowning the thread in the usual sosoe bullshit rhetoric.<br /> <br /> - The Initial statement which i commented on was you pointing out that the thread was left there becasue if fitted the soe agenda, you were clearly proven wrong<br /> <br /> - as this account hasnt been deleted the record shows that i stated whenever an sosoe member started to swear and become insulting in a thread then so would i from that moment on. James first used the term, i just mirrored it back at him as i stated i would. I even recall pies actually complementing me on the fact that i resorted to such tactics.<br /> <br /> - as regards duty as soe admin, wrong as usual. reread what i posted (obviously you clearly don't).<br /> <br /> - As for the rest of the bullshit in your reply, the usual rhetoric. As i see you standing there jumping up and down stamping your feet, clenched fists, tears running down your cheeks, teeth gritting and shaking wildly like a little kid throwing a tantrum after being caught out and unable to get his way. Your statement was completely false and intendingly misleading yet easily disproven.<br /> <br /> - until your next cock-up......or maybe not.... the level of the attacks is pathetic, to put it bluntly sosoe is just not important, i see you guys even have to resort to the size of someones ass to get your daily fix for something to piss on...<br /> <br /> <cite>DeusEx said:</cite><blockquote cite="http://saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com/forum/topics/societys-satanpierre?x=1&amp;id=2827019%3ATopic%3A22734&amp;page=3#2827019Comment23005"><div>Tony, I swear not because I am frustrated but because it's just how I talk. Nice try though. You little character assassination attempt has failed, once again I might add. I have not attempted to mislead anyone here and you can clearly see the post in it's entirety. The majority, you do understand the word, is against SOSOE. My agenda is to document the truth and present it to the people of SOSOE. Your agenda is to yourself as the SOE "Admin Coordinator" and to cover up for Brad. I don't manipulate things but you know a lot about doing that,,,just look at your record on NSI, SOE, and here. You assert that you are not "fixated" with the post on SOE and I will agree with you with that. You don't do your job as the "Admin Coordinator". You allowed women to be taken advantage of, people to be manipulated and scammed for money, banned SOSOE users that did no wrong, and you lied to SOE and SOSOE members. Your trying to create some sort of agenda other than what I mentioned above and attempt to tarnish my character shows how ridiculous you have become. Your refuse to acknowledge your failures but are quick to try to create faults with others such as myself or James. Now since you don't swear, should I take it that you got frustrated by the comment James made which caused you to call him an asshole? Maybe next time you'll think before trying to attack one of us so you don't look like more of an asshole than you already are. BTW, we know why you agree with Brad on getting SOSOE shut down. We've shown you for what you truly are.<br/><br/><cite>Tony said:</cite><blockquote cite="http://saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com/forum/topics/societys-satanpierre?page=3&amp;commentId=2827019%3AComment%3A23002&amp;x=1#2827019Comment23002"><div>nice try but it wont work Deusx except for the members here. We are not fixated with posts, information is shared. You were clearly PWND as you like to say here. No, the admins did not leave it up because it fitted our agenda by being an attack on sosoe, nor are the admins responsible for examining every post. They are there to welcome people and help them navigate the network to find the information they are looking for. Your resorting to swearing and insults shows your frustration at fucking up with another useless attempt to manipulate a post to fit your agenda. Your underhanded attempt backfired. here as final proof is a mail from pierre (sunin fun) posted well before the other posts where he tried to post an attack made bij himself as pierre here at sosoe. As can be seen from my initial mail to him he tried to post an attack on sosoe at soe and stated that he agreed with Pierre. I made it clear to him that such attacks (even if aimed at a hate site) are not tolerated. He had the bad luck that when i logged in his post was on the main page. So despite our "elusive agenda" an attack on sosoe was not allowed to remain. Once again proof of our "non fixation" on posts or their content.<br/><br/><br/><p style="TEXT-ALIGN: left"><img alt="" src="http://api.ning.com/files/7GTTWcGKGROorZ3YvQLGRn*HJk7L0bSxwA7h6smBwjOpAI-aLBrgHw-9CY1K7O7lfs5sbPrV8OH95dkWpY13E22JCsGZ5jv-/attackonsosoe.jpg" width="1280" height="960"/></p> <br/><cite>DeusEx said:</cite><blockquote cite="http://saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com/forum/topics/societys-satanpierre?x=1&amp;id=2827019%3ATopic%3A22734&amp;page=3#2827019Comment23000"><div>LOL, yeah that's the funniest part but Tony likes to brow beat things to distract from the real issues at hand.<br/><br/><cite>ParadigmShift said:</cite><blockquote cite="http://saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com/forum/topics/societys-satanpierre?page=3&amp;commentId=2827019%3AComment%3A22997&amp;x=1#2827019Comment22997"><div>I just thought I'd point out to you that you're arguing over the content of a thread started by <b>Pierre</b>.</div> </blockquote> </div> </blockquote> </div> </blockquote> </div> </blockquote> Yes, the content. Deus said... tag:saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com,2009-08-02:2827019:Comment:23006 2009-08-02T02:35:03.492Z ParadigmShift Yes, the content. Deus said pierre's post was left there by you because it <b>contained</b> attacks against SOSOE. You are arguing that by pointing out that his post also <b>contained</b> an attack on SOE.<br /> <br /> Apparently you're trying to make the ever-so-convenient point that you don't read every post on SOE, which is funny since every single post from an SOSOE member on SOE tends to be instantly read and deleted/banned within a few minutes at most. But then again I suppose that so long as you're i&hellip; Yes, the content. Deus said pierre's post was left there by you because it <b>contained</b> attacks against SOSOE. You are arguing that by pointing out that his post also <b>contained</b> an attack on SOE.<br /> <br /> Apparently you're trying to make the ever-so-convenient point that you don't read every post on SOE, which is funny since every single post from an SOSOE member on SOE tends to be instantly read and deleted/banned within a few minutes at most. But then again I suppose that so long as you're in the position to benefit from it, you'll entertain the idea of "coincidence" on this one.<br /> <br /> Maybe the reason you're dragging this out for so long is that you see it as an opportunity to make a case in your favor as an admin. I mean it would make sense after failing to make a case by defending Brad, or explaining how SOSOE members are mysteriously and yet again, conveniently banned. Then all that is left is the impotent "administrative coordinator" scratching his innocent little head. Then we're supposed to believe that besimi or indigobliss are the ones hawking this site, banning people like linda, choshu, whoever else you used this excuse on, without accountability.<br /> <br /> Maybe this is why it's more appealing to run around in a stalemate where you pretend to have a serious discussion about just exactly what a complete psychopath was trying to say in his deranged rant. Tony, I swear not because I... tag:saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com,2009-08-02:2827019:Comment:23005 2009-08-02T02:18:08.916Z DeusEx Tony, I swear not because I am frustrated but because it's just how I talk. Nice try though. You little character assassination attempt has failed, once again I might add. I have not attempted to mislead anyone here and you can clearly see the post in it's entirety. The majority, you do understand the word, is against SOSOE. My agenda is to document the truth and present it to the people of SOSOE. Your agenda is to yourself as the SOE "Admin Coordinator" and to cover up for Brad. I don't manipul&hellip; Tony, I swear not because I am frustrated but because it's just how I talk. Nice try though. You little character assassination attempt has failed, once again I might add. I have not attempted to mislead anyone here and you can clearly see the post in it's entirety. The majority, you do understand the word, is against SOSOE. My agenda is to document the truth and present it to the people of SOSOE. Your agenda is to yourself as the SOE "Admin Coordinator" and to cover up for Brad. I don't manipulate things but you know a lot about doing that,,,just look at your record on NSI, SOE, and here. You assert that you are not "fixated" with the post on SOE and I will agree with you with that. You don't do your job as the "Admin Coordinator". You allowed women to be taken advantage of, people to be manipulated and scammed for money, banned SOSOE users that did no wrong, and you lied to SOE and SOSOE members. Your trying to create some sort of agenda other than what I mentioned above and attempt to tarnish my character shows how ridiculous you have become. Your refuse to acknowledge your failures but are quick to try to create faults with others such as myself or James. Now since you don't swear, should I take it that you got frustrated by the comment James made which caused you to call him an asshole? Maybe next time you'll think before trying to attack one of us so you don't look like more of an asshole than you already are. BTW, we know why you agree with Brad on getting SOSOE shut down. We've shown you for what you truly are.<br /> <br /> <cite>Tony said:</cite><blockquote cite="http://saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com/forum/topics/societys-satanpierre?page=3&amp;commentId=2827019%3AComment%3A23002&amp;x=1#2827019Comment23002"><div>nice try but it wont work Deusx except for the members here. We are not fixated with posts, information is shared. You were clearly PWND as you like to say here. No, the admins did not leave it up because it fitted our agenda by being an attack on sosoe, nor are the admins responsible for examining every post. They are there to welcome people and help them navigate the network to find the information they are looking for. Your resorting to swearing and insults shows your frustration at fucking up with another useless attempt to manipulate a post to fit your agenda. Your underhanded attempt backfired. here as final proof is a mail from pierre (sunin fun) posted well before the other posts where he tried to post an attack made bij himself as pierre here at sosoe. As can be seen from my initial mail to him he tried to post an attack on sosoe at soe and stated that he agreed with Pierre. I made it clear to him that such attacks (even if aimed at a hate site) are not tolerated. He had the bad luck that when i logged in his post was on the main page. So despite our "elusive agenda" an attack on sosoe was not allowed to remain. Once again proof of our "non fixation" on posts or their content.<br/> <br/> <br/> <p style="text-align: left;"><img src="http://api.ning.com/files/7GTTWcGKGROorZ3YvQLGRn*HJk7L0bSxwA7h6smBwjOpAI-aLBrgHw-9CY1K7O7lfs5sbPrV8OH95dkWpY13E22JCsGZ5jv-/attackonsosoe.jpg" alt="" height="960" width="1280"/></p> <br/> <cite>DeusEx said:</cite><blockquote cite="http://saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com/forum/topics/societys-satanpierre?x=1&amp;id=2827019%3ATopic%3A22734&amp;page=3#2827019Comment23000"><div>LOL, yeah that's the funniest part but Tony likes to brow beat things to distract from the real issues at hand.<br/><br/><cite>ParadigmShift said:</cite><blockquote cite="http://saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com/forum/topics/societys-satanpierre?page=3&amp;commentId=2827019%3AComment%3A22997&amp;x=1#2827019Comment22997"><div>I just thought I'd point out to you that you're arguing over the content of a thread started by <b>Pierre</b>.</div> </blockquote> </div> </blockquote> </div> </blockquote> @Tony The exact quote that... tag:saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com,2009-08-02:2827019:Comment:23004 2009-08-02T02:12:20.835Z LeavingSOE @Tony<br /> <br /> The exact quote that brought you out from under the bridge:<br /> <br /> "I'm amazed Tony and the other moderators are allowing his shit to continue but then again he's speaking out against SOSOE so it's good for Brad and their agenda."<br /> <br /> I didn't read this as,"Tony left it up because Funin Sun/Pierre is speaking out against SOSOE." I think you're the one making assumptions here. I actually saw you and Brad both post along side Funin Sun in threads that was aimed at SOSOE - a thread where Funin Sun co&hellip; @Tony<br /> <br /> The exact quote that brought you out from under the bridge:<br /> <br /> "I'm amazed Tony and the other moderators are allowing his shit to continue but then again he's speaking out against SOSOE so it's good for Brad and their agenda."<br /> <br /> I didn't read this as,"Tony left it up because Funin Sun/Pierre is speaking out against SOSOE." I think you're the one making assumptions here. I actually saw you and Brad both post along side Funin Sun in threads that was aimed at SOSOE - a thread where Funin Sun commented violently about SOSOE members (that includes both you and Brad, by the way). So either a) you don't read the other comments when you post in a thread or b) you didn't see a problem with Funin Sun's comments. Too bad we didn't get a screencap of that thread. Now that you've banned Funin Sun, the evidence is scrubbed away, and you can rewrite history however you see fit.<br /> <br /> Don't get me wrong, I think Funin Sun/Pierre has no business being online unsupervised and a ban was in order. I just find it interesting that you waited on the ban until somewhere here pointed it out instead of after you (more likely than not) saw his comments in the thread you responded to.<br /> <br /> C'est la vie.<br /> <br /> <cite>Tony said:</cite><blockquote cite="http://saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com/forum/topics/societys-satanpierre?x=1&amp;id=2827019%3ATopic%3A22734&amp;page=3#2827019Comment23003"><div>Not the content PS, but the statement made by Deusx that it was purely left there as it attacked sosoe and fitted our agenda. This statement ofcourse fitted his agenda to blacken soe whenever possible. Where i have stated and proven that we don't check every post made nor do we intend to do so.<br/> <br/> <cite>ParadigmShift said:</cite><blockquote cite="http://saviorsofsaviorsofearth.ning.com/forum/topics/societys-satanpierre?x=1&amp;id=2827019%3ATopic%3A22734&amp;page=3#2827019Comment22997"><div>I just thought I'd point out to you that you're arguing over the content of a thread started by <b>Pierre</b>.</div> </blockquote> </div> </blockquote>