Earthlings, Chiaroscuros and Sfumatos, United to Save the Saviors
We're sorry, but this discussion has just been closed to further replies.
oh noes turns out pierre was ingeniously playing the role of a crazy person to test us....or something...
http://saviorsofearth.ning.com/forum/topics/please-read-this-lesson
I'm amazed Tony and the other moderators are allowing his shit to continue but then again he's speaking out against SOSOE so it's good for Brad and their agenda. :
haha Deux, speak of "pick and chose" as you so wronly pointed out in the past. Then how about the following passage in the thread you quoted "Now I’m not saying the SOE would pass that same test... actually, one was done at the beginning of it and failed, it was at a horrifying level then… now I don’t know what to think. I love the love and spirituality of the place, but not the run by manipulation. We can start one that can speak of love, spirituality, and societal truth. In fact, I have, and if you want it, msg me"
Clearly an attack on soe itsself, but as pointed out to you time and time again...."we are not fixated with all that is shared between members as you guys are. Not all posts are read or scrutinized, only those on the main page (at the time of login) or pointed out by members via mail. It's an information site sharing information spanning many areas of interest. But thanks for pointing this one out, this member had been banned under a different name and will again be banned. To add to the reasons for banning him will be the threats he posted here. All in all a member which no ning site would like to have as a member apart from his own ning site
DeusEx said:I'm amazed Tony and the other moderators are allowing his shit to continue but then again he's speaking out against SOSOE so it's good for Brad and their agenda. :
Instead of making your little jabs that we here at SOSOE are "fixated with" SOE member posts, understand that we in fact care and have more compassion than you or any of the others do. So how about replying back to one of those posts on SOE about SOSOE and giving us some love (credit) for helping point out a dangerous user and one that did indeed deserved to be banned?
Tony said:haha Deux, speak of "pick and chose" as you so wronly pointed out in the past. Then how about the following passage in the thread you quoted "Now I’m not saying the SOE would pass that same test... actually, one was done at the beginning of it and failed, it was at a horrifying level then… now I don’t know what to think. I love the love and spirituality of the place, but not the run by manipulation. We can start one that can speak of love, spirituality, and societal truth. In fact, I have, and if you want it, msg me"
Clearly an attack on soe itsself, but as pointed out to you time and time again...."we are not fixated with all that is shared between members as you guys are. Not all posts are read or scrutinized, only those on the main page (at the time of login) or pointed out by members via mail. It's an information site sharing information spanning many areas of interest. But thanks for pointing this one out, this member had been banned under a different name and will again be banned. To add to the reasons for banning him will be the threats he posted here. All in all a member which no ning site would like to have as a member apart from his own ning site
DeusEx said:I'm amazed Tony and the other moderators are allowing his shit to continue but then again he's speaking out against SOSOE so it's good for Brad and their agenda. :
dont skip the point pointed out to you Deux. The thread clearly attacked both sosoe and soe yet you chose to focus on the one aspect., no need for your ? the person clearly has issues with himself.
As for posts here and at soe, i dont look at a fraction of the posts. If any are of that great importance then put a link here for me to find the ones you think are pressing enough to be replied to. The reason for this quick response is because i forgot to point out the post made by horn against whateverhisname is which was full of aggrevated personal attacks. That post to was left alone, unless complaints come in then 99% of posts go unchecked and unadmined. As for the thread you pointed out (and his others), they will be removed when the member is banned.
DeusEx said:Instead of making your little jabs that we here at SOSOE are "fixated with" SOE member posts, understand that we in fact care and have more compassion than you or any of the others do. So how about replying back to one of those posts on SOE about SOSOE and giving us some love (credit) for helping point out a dangerous user and one that did indeed deserved to be banned?
Tony said:haha Deux, speak of "pick and chose" as you so wronly pointed out in the past. Then how about the following passage in the thread you quoted "Now I’m not saying the SOE would pass that same test... actually, one was done at the beginning of it and failed, it was at a horrifying level then… now I don’t know what to think. I love the love and spirituality of the place, but not the run by manipulation. We can start one that can speak of love, spirituality, and societal truth. In fact, I have, and if you want it, msg me"
Clearly an attack on soe itsself, but as pointed out to you time and time again...."we are not fixated with all that is shared between members as you guys are. Not all posts are read or scrutinized, only those on the main page (at the time of login) or pointed out by members via mail. It's an information site sharing information spanning many areas of interest. But thanks for pointing this one out, this member had been banned under a different name and will again be banned. To add to the reasons for banning him will be the threats he posted here. All in all a member which no ning site would like to have as a member apart from his own ning site
DeusEx said:I'm amazed Tony and the other moderators are allowing his shit to continue but then again he's speaking out against SOSOE so it's good for Brad and their agenda. :
Tony, I read the entire post by Pierre and noticed the SOE part which made it even funnier that you left it up there. It is not my place to point out such things to you. You would prefer to turn things on me rather than admit your failure to properly perform your duties as a moderator. Not only was his post full of lies and other disinfo about SOSOE but it also had a few jabs at SOE. I chose to focus on the SOSOE portion as the majority of what was written is about SOSOE. I will continue to put posts here that interest SOSOE members, but no thank you I won't do your work for you.
Tony said:dont skip the point pointed out to you Deux. The thread clearly attacked both sosoe and soe yet you chose to focus on the one aspect., no need for your ? the person clearly has issues with himself.
As for posts here and at soe, i dont look at a fraction of the posts. If any are of that great importance then put a link here for me to find the ones you think are pressing enough to be replied to. The reason for this quick response is because i forgot to point out the post made by horn against whateverhisname is which was full of aggrevated personal attacks. That post to was left alone, unless complaints come in then 99% of posts go unchecked and unadmined. As for the thread you pointed out (and his others), they will be removed when the member is banned.
DeusEx said:Instead of making your little jabs that we here at SOSOE are "fixated with" SOE member posts, understand that we in fact care and have more compassion than you or any of the others do. So how about replying back to one of those posts on SOE about SOSOE and giving us some love (credit) for helping point out a dangerous user and one that did indeed deserved to be banned?
Tony said:haha Deux, speak of "pick and chose" as you so wronly pointed out in the past. Then how about the following passage in the thread you quoted "Now I’m not saying the SOE would pass that same test... actually, one was done at the beginning of it and failed, it was at a horrifying level then… now I don’t know what to think. I love the love and spirituality of the place, but not the run by manipulation. We can start one that can speak of love, spirituality, and societal truth. In fact, I have, and if you want it, msg me"
Clearly an attack on soe itsself, but as pointed out to you time and time again...."we are not fixated with all that is shared between members as you guys are. Not all posts are read or scrutinized, only those on the main page (at the time of login) or pointed out by members via mail. It's an information site sharing information spanning many areas of interest. But thanks for pointing this one out, this member had been banned under a different name and will again be banned. To add to the reasons for banning him will be the threats he posted here. All in all a member which no ning site would like to have as a member apart from his own ning site
DeusEx said:I'm amazed Tony and the other moderators are allowing his shit to continue but then again he's speaking out against SOSOE so it's good for Brad and their agenda. :
© 2009 Created by LeavingSOE on Ning. Create Your Own Social Network